Commentary by Stefanie Syman

 Gates has a remarkable facility for casting something that already exists
 and that most people take for granted -- doing business with "strangers" --
 as the ripening fruit of technological progress. While our monetary
 system has served us reasonably well these two hundred years, he asks us
 to join him in his starry-eyed faith that digital security will, unlike
 past anti-counterfeiting measures, be immune to the most sophisticated
 criminal mind. Public key cryptography is indeed one of the best
 solutions to the problem of authenticating digital documents. But even a
 modest knowledge of history suggests that as the technology of privacy
 improves, so do the skills of those who would breach it. In the world of
 atoms, think of Kryptonite locks. In the world of bits: determined grad
 students find chinks in Netscape security despite claims to
 impenetrability. It's as if Gates were wearing binary beer goggles which
 make the future look luscious and unblemished, and transform the past into
 a kind fairy tale of insularity: a mythical land where cousins married
 cousins, and sons and daughters worked for their fathers or aunts. The
 inhabitants of this land had no legal tender since everyone claimed some
 common blood and thus trusted that every promise would be kept, every debt
 repaid in kind. Though neighboring towns wished to trade with the citizens
 of this Lilliputian nation, these simple folks always refused, fearing
 that such intimate transactions with strangers might spoil their pristine
 society....

 Such a nation has never existed. If anyone knows the dangers of an economy
 where you cannot "do business with strangers," it's Bill Gates. After all,
 his fortune was made in commerce with millions of Americans and foreigners
 and, given his preference for staying indoors, I can't believe Bill enjoyed
 relationships with all of them. Instead, the SEC and the Federal Reserve
 have provided sufficient assurance that the transactions that filled his
 coffers were valid. Moreover, the supposedly titillating possibility of
 doing business with people you distrust holds only sinister promise. That
 is, unless you're planning to expand operations to Russia and are
 calculating payoffs as a percentage of business costs.

Return to the Document