| Next-in-Thread | Next Response | Previous Response | Next Thread |

Feedback: Muzak bad?

Base: Music Discussion
Keywords: so where's the beef (complaint)?
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 20:38:03 GMT
From: @piweba5y-ext.prodigy.com
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 02:32:41 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) PHP/3.0.12 Last-Modified: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 20:34:43 GMT ETag: "2b12e-175-30a7abe3" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 373 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html X-Pad: avoid browser bug If M is supposed to be a form of subliminal brainwashing, the article's description of the purpose and process of its editing, doesn't support that thesis. Although the article indicates M is supposed to go through cycles of intensity, it all sounds tepid to me. Admittedly, I've never sat and listened to it for several hours, just long enough to get to my elevator stop.

Responses [Embed Depth: 1 2 3 All] [Outline Depth: 1 2 3 9 All]

1. None: where cAN i get brainwashed (adam past)
-> None: Brainwashed? No, just lack of rumor control. (SB)
a Response to: "Muzak bad?"

| Next-in-Thread | Next Response | Previous Response | Next Thread |
| Notification | Copy/Move/Delete | Admin Mode |
| Membership | Help for HyperNews 1.9B5.6 | Frames |