HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:37:35 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) PHP/3.0.12 Last-Modified: Wed, 03 Jan 1996 21:54:06 GMT ETag: "2a3e4-32b-30eafafe" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 811 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html X-Pad: avoid browser bug Music Discussion

On Music Discussion

Welcome to the Feedbag discussion group for the "On Music" topic. Right now, we're particularly interested in responses to Alexander Star's FEED Feature, "Monumental Rock." What are *your* thoughts on the new rock and roll hall of fame? Worried about what happens when rebellion goes institutional? What about the whole rock-as-Dionysian-ritual argument? FEED editors and contributors will be taking part in the discussion, so stay tuned...

The Editors

P.S. Don't forget to enter your name at the bottom of the Hypernews form when you post a message -- even if you're a registered FEED subscriber. Otherwise, your posts will be anonymous.


Responses [Embed Depth: 1 2 3 All] [Outline Depth: 1 2 3 9 All]

1. no more programming of my mood ([email protected])
...
3. Feedback: Muzak bad? (@piweba5y-ext.prodigy.com)
...
5. More: So ... does it work? ([email protected])
...
6. Question: Just an Old Fashioned... (@piweba2y-ext.prodigy.com)
7. Question: Gifford on muzac (Knud Romer Jorgensen)
8. Running with the Devil (Tony Hubert)
9. Disagree: Typical "music critic" (tim frommer)
...
10. Museum? (Issa Clubb)
...
11. None: Monumental Rock (Paul Ehrlich)
...
12. None: Ten Second Top Fifty nominations (Steven Johnson -- FEED)
...
13. Idea: From the Lips of Momus
14. None: Black Dog by Zeppelin ([email protected])
16. Question: BRAIN WASHED AND BORED (David Isaac)
17. Angry: Untitled (Jason)
18. None: where can I download a muzak player? new
a Response to: "Music Discussion"

| Next-in-Thread | Next Response | Previous Response | Next Thread |
| Notification | Admin Mode |
| Membership | Help for HyperNews 1.9B5.6 | Frames |